This is an action by the plaintiffs jack cline and ruth cline to enjoin the defendant franklin pork inc from the operation of a pig feeding operation the plaintiffs alleged that the operation constitutes a nuisance and interferes with the plaintiffs use and enjoyment of their home and farm. Cline v franklin pork inc 210 neb 238 242 43 313 nw2d 667 670 1981 here the defendants had more than 20 months from the time of franklin pork i to remedy the nuisance and more than 4 years from the time of the first trial in which to remedy the nuisance. Duties of a judge at one and the same time cline v franklin pork inc 313 nw2d 667 671 neb 1981 a judge may not be compelled to testify regarding his mental processes used in formulating a decision the reasons or motivations for performing official duties or facts learned during the judicial process see eg united states v. Duties of a judge at one and the same time cline v franklin pork inc 313 nw2d 667 671 neb 1981 the information sought through the motion is irrelevant to the final evidentiary hearing on the sanctions matters the movant by failing to appeal the february 27 2007 order or to file a petition seeking a writ of mandamus with
How it works:
1. Register a Free 1 month Trial Account.
2. Download as many books as you like (Personal use)
3. No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
4. Join with over 1.000.000 Happy Readers.
5. That's it. What are you waiting for? Sign Up and Get Your Books.